<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate on Simulation Exercises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inclusivedesign.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/debate-on-simulation-exercises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inclusivedesign.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/debate-on-simulation-exercises/</link>
	<description>Advocacy, Research &#38; Information on Accessible and Inclusive Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eleanor</title>
		<link>http://inclusivedesign.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/debate-on-simulation-exercises/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>eleanor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inclusivedesign.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/debate-on-simulation-exercises/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hello Naziaty,

How nice to find your blog. I am a Malaysian who has lived too many years abroad but I am  involved in Disability Equality field. As a wheelchair user, I think perhaps our objections is that the person in a  simulation exercise can get up and walk away.  And then &quot;there but for the grace of God&quot; - I think there is a whole disability culture discussion to be done here. My wheelchair is not a barrier -it is a facilitator. People who go in a chair and then give anecdotes about how s/he finds being in it a &quot;experience&quot; misses the complexity of being a wheelchair user. It follows the medical model in a way - if you understand what I am trying to explain here.
People who are visually impaired or blind do not object - perhaps because they do not &#039; see&#039; it happening. However, I am not sure my visually impaired friends do not feel the same objections about this kind of stimulation.
But you are right in that it can be included carefully into a well designed training system...to get away from the &#039; sayang....&#039; attitude.
I am learning to do accessibility audits at the moment. I would love to come back and do an audit as a trial...any chances of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Naziaty,</p>
<p>How nice to find your blog. I am a Malaysian who has lived too many years abroad but I am  involved in Disability Equality field. As a wheelchair user, I think perhaps our objections is that the person in a  simulation exercise can get up and walk away.  And then &#8220;there but for the grace of God&#8221; &#8211; I think there is a whole disability culture discussion to be done here. My wheelchair is not a barrier -it is a facilitator. People who go in a chair and then give anecdotes about how s/he finds being in it a &#8220;experience&#8221; misses the complexity of being a wheelchair user. It follows the medical model in a way &#8211; if you understand what I am trying to explain here.<br />
People who are visually impaired or blind do not object &#8211; perhaps because they do not &#8216; see&#8217; it happening. However, I am not sure my visually impaired friends do not feel the same objections about this kind of stimulation.<br />
But you are right in that it can be included carefully into a well designed training system&#8230;to get away from the &#8216; sayang&#8230;.&#8217; attitude.<br />
I am learning to do accessibility audits at the moment. I would love to come back and do an audit as a trial&#8230;any chances of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
